Claims Advice

Why Home Insurance Claims Get Rejected, and What to Do Next

Most rejected home insurance claims fall into a handful of categories. Here is why claims are refused, and what your options are if yours has been.

24/7 Support

Call Us Anytime

Expert Guidance

Years Of Experience

Peace of Mind

We'll Handle Your Claim

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Read Our Reviews

Claims Advice8 min read
A homeowner reviewing insurance claim paperwork at a table

Having a claim turned down is a horrible moment. You have paid your premiums for years, something has gone wrong with your home, and the one time you need the policy to work it appears not to. The instinctive reaction is that the insurer is simply refusing to pay.

Sometimes that is close to the truth. More often the rejection comes down to something specific and identifiable, and a good number of those reasons can be challenged. Understanding which category your rejection falls into is the first step, because it determines whether there is anything to be done.

The most common reasons claims are refused

1. Gradual damage rather than a sudden event

This is the big one, particularly with water. Home insurance is designed to cover sudden, unexpected events. It is not designed to cover deterioration that has happened slowly over months or years. If a pipe bursts and floods your kitchen overnight, that is a sudden event. If a joint has been weeping behind a wall since last winter and the damage has crept outwards, an insurer may well argue it is gradual damage and therefore excluded.

The line between the two is far blurrier than insurers often present it. A slow leak can cause sudden, catastrophic failure. Damage can be genuinely undetectable until the moment a ceiling comes down. This is one of the most frequently contested grounds for rejection, and one of the most winnable when the evidence is presented properly. Our page on escape of water and burst pipe claims covers how these are assessed.

2. Lack of maintenance

Policies expect you to keep the property in reasonable repair. If a storm lifts tiles from a roof that was already in poor condition, the insurer may argue the loss was caused by the state of the roof rather than the weather. The same logic gets applied to blocked gutters, perished sealant and ageing flat roofs.

Again, this is arguable. The question is not whether the property was in perfect condition, it is whether the damage was actually caused by the insured event. Very few homes are flawless, and an insurer cannot decline every claim on a property that shows normal wear.

3. Non-disclosure when the policy was taken out

If the information given at the point of sale or renewal was incomplete or inaccurate, an insurer may treat the policy as misrepresented. Common examples include not declaring previous claims, not mentioning subsidence history, not updating the insurer after building work, or getting the number of bedrooms or the rebuild value wrong.

How an insurer is allowed to respond depends on whether the misrepresentation was deliberate or careless, and on what the insurer would have done had it known. An honest mistake is treated differently from a deliberate one, and a blanket refusal is not automatically correct.

4. The property was unoccupied

Most policies restrict cover when a property has been empty beyond a set period, often 30 to 60 consecutive days. This catches people out constantly: a probate property, a house being renovated, a long stay in hospital, or a rental between tenancies. Escape of water is usually the first thing excluded once the unoccupancy clause bites.

5. A policy condition was not met

Policies carry conditions, and breaching one can give the insurer grounds to decline. Typical examples include not setting an alarm, not draining the system down when leaving a property empty in winter, or not reporting the incident within the time the policy requires.

6. The claim value fell below the excess

Less a rejection than an outcome, but worth checking. If your excess is substantial, particularly on subsidence or escape of water where excesses are often higher, a modest claim may simply not exceed it.

What to do if your claim has been rejected

Get the reason in writing

Ask the insurer to set out, in writing, exactly why the claim has been declined and which policy term they are relying on. A vague verbal explanation is not something you can challenge. A specific written one, citing a clause, gives you something concrete to examine.

Read the policy wording yourself, not the summary

The insurance product information document is a summary. The full policy wording is the contract. Find the clause the insurer is relying on and read it in full, including any definitions. Insurers occasionally apply a clause more broadly than the wording actually supports.

Gather your own evidence

If the dispute is about causation, and most are, evidence decides it. That can mean photographs, maintenance and service records, receipts for prior repairs, plumbing or roofing reports, or a written opinion from an independent expert. The party with the better evidence usually prevails, and there is no rule that says the insurer's assessment is the only one that counts.

Use the insurer's formal complaints process

Before anything else can happen, you generally need to exhaust the insurer's own complaints procedure. Put the complaint in writing, state clearly what you want, and attach your evidence. Insurers have a defined window to respond, and a formal complaint is handled by a different team from the one that made the original decision.

Escalate to the Financial Ombudsman Service

If the insurer's final response does not resolve it, you can refer the complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. The service is free to consumers, and it can look at whether the insurer treated you fairly, not merely whether it followed the wording to the letter. There are time limits for referring a complaint, so do not let it drift.

Where a loss assessor fits in

A loss adjuster works for the insurer. A loss assessor works for you. That distinction matters enormously when a claim is contested, and it is explained in full on our loss assessor vs loss adjuster page.

On a rejected claim, our role is to look at the decision independently, work out whether the stated reason genuinely holds up against the policy wording and the physical evidence, and where it does not, put together the case that says so. Sometimes that means commissioning an expert report. Sometimes it means demonstrating that damage the insurer called gradual was in fact sudden. Occasionally it means telling a client honestly that the rejection is sound and they would be spending money for nothing.

A rejection is a decision, not a verdict. It is made by one party to the contract, and it can be examined, challenged and overturned where the evidence supports it.

If your claim has been declined and you are not sure whether the reason stands up, get in touch. We will tell you what we think, including when we think the insurer has it right. You can also read about how we handle a claim from first contact through to settlement.

This article is general information about how home insurance claims work in the UK. It is not advice on your individual claim, which will turn on your own policy wording and circumstances. For advice on your situation, speak to our team.

Speak to a loss assessor about your claim

If any of this applies to a claim you are dealing with, we will talk it through with you. The initial consultation is free and we will tell you honestly where you stand.

We've Got Answers

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, it happens regularly. A rejection is a decision made by one party to the contract, not a final verdict. If the stated reason does not stand up against the policy wording or the physical evidence, it can be challenged through the insurer's complaints process and, if necessary, the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Gradual damage is the most frequent, particularly with water. Policies cover sudden and unexpected events rather than deterioration over time, so insurers often argue that a leak developed slowly. The distinction is frequently arguable, because a slow leak can still cause sudden failure.

You should raise a complaint with your insurer as soon as possible. If you are not satisfied with their final response, there are time limits for referring the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service, so it is important not to let the matter drift. Check the deadline stated in your insurer's final response letter.

Our initial consultation is free and we agree our fee in writing before any work begins. We will also tell you honestly if we think the insurer's decision is sound and there is nothing to be gained from challenging it.